Traditional Credit Assessment in Raising Money
Raising money is a daunting task to small business borrowers. Most lenders depend on traditional credit information sources and analytics such as obtaining an entrepreneur’s credit score. Providers of credit such as banks, credit card companies, depend on credit scores to assess the prospective risk posed by the potential borrowers.
For the small business borrower raising money, many entrepreneurs feel that they are at a disadvantage. In an empirical study by Allen N. Berger, Adrian M. Cowan, and W. Scott Frame (2011) found the use of consumer credit scores rather than business credit scores by community banks in small business lending when the banks underwrote small business credits. Community banks often used the scoring for only very small loans typically under $50,000. The study suggests that community banks depended more relationship lending than the using of technology when utilized credit scores for automatic approval/rejection of loan applicants.
In the U.S. the most widely used statistical credit score model is the FICO score initially developed in 1956 by Bill Fair and Earl Isaac and sold by the FICO Company. The FICO Score model is designed to measure the risk of default by taking into account numerous factors in a person’s financial history such as payment record, the utilization of credit, length of credit history, the type of credit used, and other proprietary metrics.
Currently there is an emergence of companies chasing small-business loans by using alternative data sourcing then consumer credit scores to extend credit. These companies include Capital Assess Network, Kabbage, and Amazon
Kabbage leverages social media data as part of lending decisions. The company grants working capital to online merchants as its credit risk model encompasses social media and loyalty assessments in an effort to attract, interact with, and retain small business clientele.
The Atlanta base company founded in September 2011, Kabbage connects with clients Facebook fan pages and twitter feeds. According to the Credit Union Times (Samaad, 2012), Facebook and Twitter feeds are immediately analyzed and translated into capital. With merchants increasing the number of followers, the enhanced activities and chatter on Facebook and Twitter increases the amount of capital access. Known a Social Klimbing, the merchant cash advance is called a “Kabbage Advance.”
The advance is not a loan. No interest charge is assessed. A fee is charged base on how long the advance is outstanding. No prepayment is assessed for early payments. Advances range from one to six months. The company founded a correlation between the activity on social media and default rates. Merchant cans obtain advances as low as $500 up to $100,000.
Last year in May, Bank Technology News awarded Kabbage’s CEO Rob Frohwein for conceptualizing its breakthrough technology and data platform that provides working capital to small business in less than seven minutes. In winning the Top 10 Innovator award, Frohwein was recognized for its significant impact on small business (PR Newswire, 2012).
Kabbage received venture funding by Mohr Davidow Ventures and BlueRun Ventures. Additional investors include David Bonderman, founder of TPG Capital, Warren Stephens, CEO of Stephens Inc., the UPS Strategic Enterprise Fund, and TriplePoint Ventures.
Capital Access Network, Inc.
Capital Access Network, Inc. (CAN) is becoming a significant player in providing small business credit scoring and capital. The company developed a technology platform that automatically analyzes a multitude of business performance variables that integrate data sources from banking, credit card processing data and other sources with its proprietary risk models assessing over 100,000 transactions over multiple business cycles reviewing over 650 SIC codes. Its model is considered an alternative to the FICO score. Over $2.5 billion in working capital financing were granted to small businesses since 1998 through NewLogic Business Loans, Inc. and AdvanceMe, Inc., both CAN subsidiaries.
Determining the strength of a business based on business performance rather than personal credit scores and the ability to provide access to capital has given CAN a leg up on other small business lenders. WebBank, a Utah-chartered FDIC industrial bank underwrites the loans for NewLogic Business Loans Inc. and AdvanceMe, Inc.
Headquartered New York headquarters, Capital Assess Network has presence in Boston, Atlanta and San Jose, including Costa Rica. The company employs approximately 400 people with the majority focused on data services technology and analytics.
Other Alternative Lenders in Raising Money
The companies using alternate means to assess credit risk to provide financing for small businesses include ZestCash, BillFloat and LendingClub.
Berger, A. N., Cowan, A. M., & Frame, w. S. (2011, August 1). The Surprising Use of Credit Scoring in Small Business Lending by Community Banks and the Attendant Effects on Credit Availability, Risk, and Profitability. Journal of Financial Services Research , 1-17.
PR Newswire. (2012). Kabbage CEO Selected as a Top Innovator by Bank Technology News . Atlanta: PR Newwire.
Samaad, M. A. (2012, June 27). Kabbage Links Social Media With Cash Advances. Credit Union Times, p. 15.
When raising money, think like a venture capital. For many entrepreneurs, success begins with a great idea. However, how do you get this idea off the ground? Raising money is needed for your company, but how do you attract investors?
Many young, emerging growth companies, understand that venture capital serves as an alternative. Often, venture capital provides cash funding in raising money, which is exchanged for shares in the business and an active role in the enterprise’s future.
In January the National Venture Capital Association, one of the trade associations representing the U.S. venture capital industry announced the results of its industry paper, MoneyTree Report, on venture funding for fiscal year 2012. The Association with PriceWaterhouseCoopers reported that venture capitalists invested about $26.5 billion in 3,698 deals last year. The report showed declines in both dollar and deal transactions down about 10% and 6%, respectively, from 2011. Fiscal year 2012 was the first drop off in venture capital activities in three years.
Economic uncertainty hindered the growth in new investments. As a result, many venture capital funds shrunk during the year. Venture capital firms have increased fund reserves to support funding of current investments and have become more discriminating in assessing new deals.
Understand that before a venture capitalist takes on higher risk the firm will determine the upside pay off. What this means is that the entrepreneur must do his or her homework to meet the expectations of the venture capital firm in raising money. This is a two-way street.
Venture capital funding comes with a price. Some of the considerations the venture capital firm will review in raising money when assessing a potential investment include:
Venture capitalist want to mitigate or manage their risk. Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, can assemble a strong management team, provide a well-written business plan, and show a leadership team that can execute the plan in raising money.
For a free online video course on how to raise money go to: http://garyrushin.com/raising-money-mini-course/
But now wait! The Jobs Act of 2012 is a game changer. Small businesses and entrepreneurs will have increased access to crowd funding sources. The U.S. federal government will allow participants in crowd funding projects to received ownership stakes. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is writing the prudential regulations (the rules) for equity participations in crowd financing activities. With the recent departure of SEC Chairwomen Mary Shapiro, the regulations have been delayed (Mandelbaum, 2012). The SEC is tasked to protect investors. Investing in small business, especially start-ups, are notoriously risking and fraudulent activity can take place.
What is Crowd Funding?
A collective effort by consumers that network and pool their moneys, usually through the Internet, crowd funding enables the investment in and support of efforts initiated by other people or organizations (Ordanini, Miceli, Pizzetti, & Parasuraman, 2011). Kickstarter and Indiegogo are leading intermediaries organized to support crowd funding. Kickstarter alone helped facilitate over U.S. $350 million in project financing pledges.
Founded in 2009 by Jeff Chen and Yencey Strickler, Kickstarter is a New York based Internet funding platform for creative projects surrounding the arts to include films, games, and music to art, design, and technology. Backed by Union Square Venture and other venture capital firms, Kickstarter’s revenue model includes receiving five percent of the funds successfully raised through its platform (Milian, 2012). Indiegogo, a San Francisco based crowd-funding site is another player in the crowd finance space. Pledges to projects can be funded in U.S. dollars, British pounds, euros, and Canadian dollars.
So how does this work?
Financial backers, which are armchair philanthropists of projects, put their trust in the project creators by providing cash in return for a promise of a future return. The return can be naming credits as with a film, a discount price of the develop item, or some insignificant benefit. With the Jobs Act, crowd funding in the U.S. is about to evolve. Providers of project funding will be able to receive equity participations. Entrepreneurs will have greater access to capital as new providers of crowd sourcing and investors see opportunities.
Examples of projects that successfully received funding in 2012 (Santos, 2012) include SmartThings, which raised over $1.2 million with the help of 5,694 backers. With an initial goal of raising $250,000, SmartThings designed a device to let users digitally monitor and control parts of their homes. As a digital hub, allows the use of apps to switch on and off appliances with a bevy of sensors and products. OUYA raised over $8.6 million from more than 63,000 supporters. The goal of the company was to initially raise only $1 million. The company’s project was a $99 Android-base gaming console that offers its own controller and promises to make game development affordable.
Lazar, S. (2012, December 27). Meet The 25-year Old Who Raised Over 8 million on Kickstarter . Retrieved May 7, 2012, from Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shira-lazar/pebble-founder-eric-migicovsky_b_1497515.html
Mandelbaum, R. (2012, December 26). Crowdfunding’ Rules Are Unlikely to Meet Deadline. Retrieved January 3, 2013, from New York Times: www.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/business/smallbusiness/why-the-sec-is-likely-to-miss-its-deadline-to-write-crowdfunding-rules.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Milian, M. (2012, August 21). After Raising Money, Many Kickstarter Projects Fail to Deliver. Retrieved December 27, 2012, from Bloomberg: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-08-21/kickstarter-s-funded-projects-see-some-stumbles
Mulian, M. (2012, December 5). Crowd-Funding Site Indiegogo Is Going International. Retrieved December 27, 2012, from Bloomberg: http://go.bloomberg.com/tech-deals/2012-12-05-crowd-funding-site-indiegogo-going-international/
Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management , 22 (4), 443-470.
Santos, A. (2012, December 27). Insert Coin: 2012’s top 10 crowd-funded projects . Retrieved January 3, 2012, from Engadget: http://www.engadget.com/2012/12/27/insert-coin-2012-top-10-crowdfunding-projects/
TechCrunch. (2011, February 14). Startup Sherpa (Kickstarter): How To Get Successful Projects. Retrieved from YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqDNWcu6Hs0
Bootstrapping is important for new and small businesses. Among other things, on average, many companies develop and flourished through the use of bootstrapping without access to long-term external financing, over a five-year period (Winborg, 2009). Bootstrapping is a form of raising capital (money) for the business. Many studies demonstrated the important role played by bootstrapping (Brush, N.M., Gatewood, Greene, & Hart, 2006). A large percentage of the businesses examined used bootstrapping to secure resources. These companies had reduced dependency on external financiers for capital. The positive influence of bootstrapping was demonstrated by profitability from the use of some kinds of bootstrapping methods (Patel & Sohl, 2007).
Access to capital continues to be tight. In a third quarter survey of lenders (Phoenix Management Services, 2012), the majority of lenders identified uncertainty as their chief concern regarding future economic growth. Less optimism was shown for opportunities of their borrowers, indicating a slight pullback in their own customer growth expectations and a reduction in new capital investments and hiring expectations. Respondents were asked whether they plan to tighten or maintain their loan structures i.e., collateral requirements, guarantees, advance rates, and loan covenants. Accordingly, in each of the four loan structures, 82 percent of lenders anticipate maintaining their loan structures in their in the near-term, which showed a slight shift towards tightening loan standards. For the entrepreneur, use of bootstrapping techniques will continue to play an important role in funding operations.
Ten tested and widely used bootstrapping techniques (Sherman, 2005) include:
Entrepreneurs have an explicit motive for using bootstrapping techniques. The deliberate choice of using bootstrapping strategies can be seen in proactive ways from reduce risks, restricting expenses, and funding business activities. Such techniques allow for business opportunities without the need to own a sizable resource base and without the need to source external financing. These methods minimize the need for cash by obtaining resources at little or no cost. Additionally, the use of resources can be acquired without the need for bank financing. Overall, entrepreneurs can utilize their social contacts to obtain free access to specific resources.
Brush, C., N.M., C., Gatewood, E., Greene, P., & Hart, M. (2006). The use of bootstrapping by women entrepreneurs in positioning for growth. Venture Capital , 8, pp. 15-18.
Patel, P. F., & Sohl, J. (2007). Bootstrapping to buffer a venture’s core commercialization processes. Academy of Management Conference. Philadelphia.
Phoenix Management Services. (2012). Lending Climate in America 3rd Quarter 2012. Chadds Ford: Phoenix Management Services.
Sherman, A. J. (2005). Raising Capital (Vol. 2). New York: American Management Association.
Winborg, J. (2009, January). Use of financial bootstrapping in new businesses: a question of last resort? Venture Capital , 11 (1), pp. 71–83.